Perspective Explosion

Analyze an idea through multiple paradigmatic lenses to surface non-obvious insights at the intersections of contradicting worldviews. Based on Michael Simmons’ perspective engine methodology.


I’m developing the following idea: $ARGUMENTS

If no idea was provided above, ask me to describe it in 2-3 sentences before proceeding.

Work through these steps in order:

Step 1 — Generate lenses. Identify 5 genuinely different paradigmatic lenses to analyze this idea. Not “pros and cons.” Each lens should represent a fundamentally different worldview — different disciplines, different assumptions about how the world works. For each lens, name the discipline and state the core assumption it brings.

Step 2 — Analyze through each lens. For each of the 5 lenses, tell me: (a) what this lens makes visible that the others miss, and (b) what this lens hides or distorts.

Step 3 — Find the contradictions. Where do two or more of these perspectives directly contradict each other? Identify the sharpest tension, then ask: what new idea becomes visible only at that intersection?

Step 4 — Extract the insight. Give me the single most non-obvious insight this analysis surfaced — one that no single lens would have produced on its own. Explain why it required the collision of perspectives to emerge.

Source